If you had been Catiline, what
would you have said to undermine Cicero's case?
Cicero's case
against Catiline was primarily based on intimidation. Cicero employed
many tactics to discredit Catiline which involved descriptions of
Catiline's despicable behavior, loose morals, and selfish ideals in
order to paint a picture of Catiline that was unfavorable at best and
loathsome at worst. Cicero approached the matter this way because, in
his case, he presents very little real proof. What he was trying to
accomplish was the destruction of Catiline's character and
reputation, because he knew that his concrete evidence was very slim.
If I had been Catiline, I would have attempted to undermine Cicero's
case by demanding he back up his accusations with proof before the
Senate, which of course Cicero would have been unable to do. If I
could prove by Cicero's lack of proof that I was innocent of his
accusations, then Cicero's case would have very little real weight.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.