What are some common misconceptions about the Crusades, and why are they incorrect?
The Crusades are a well-known piece if Western history, although
there are many misconceptions today about what they actually were and
what caused them. A popular one claims that they were an unprovoked,
unwarranted attack on Muslim nations. The reality was that the
Christians and the Muslims had had peace with one another for many
years until a more warlike group of Muslims, the Turks, conquered the
Muslim lands. These new conquerors were not as peaceful or tolerant
of Christian pilgrims as the old Muslims had been. They began
assaulting ancient cities in Asia Minor such as Ephesus, Antioch and
Nicaea that were important to the Catholics of the West. The
Byzantine emperor of the time, Alexios I Komnenos, sent word to
then-pope Urban II to beg for help against the Muslim invaders.
Another common misconception is that the Catholic crusaders were
second- or third-born sons of nobles who were not likely to inherit
any land from their fathers, and so set off to Muslim countries to
conquer and bring back wealth. Recent research shows that this is not
actually true; most of the crusaders were actually first-born nobles
with plenty of wealth already. A long and costly trip such as a
crusade, where victory was not guaranteed and many men and resources
would be lost, was not a good idea to attempt if one was simply
looking for wealth. Most crusaders returned home poorer than when
they had left, if they returned at all.
A third popular misconception concerning the Crusades is that the
Christians' attacks angered the Muslims so much that they were an
indirect cause of modern-day terrorism on Western countries. This
would be sound reasoning, save that for the Muslims, the Crusades
were a tiny blip of their history that were barely even worth
mentioning. The Crusades did not have any lasting effect on Muslim
history; indeed with the majority of Muslims, for hundreds of years
the Crusades were nearly forgotten.
Based on the different versions of Pope Urban II's speech,
discuss the main themes in the Pope's remarks.
Although there is no official record of what Pope Urban II said
in his speech, various people who heard or heard about the speech
have written it down in their own versions, so from them we can glean
an idea of what the pope's words were. A major theme of his speech
seemed to be a charge to punish the Turks, whose atrocities towards
Christians Pope Urban listed in graphic detail. This part of the
speech appeared designed to incite the crowd to anger, being "filled"
as it were with the righteous anger of God.
But that wasn't the only part of Urban's speech; in fact, most of
the sources do not even record it as the longest part. Much more of
the pope's words were directed towards encouraging peaceful Christian
behavior in kindness towards one another. The pope called out the
knights and men-at-arms of the day, saying that they had become
plunderers and murderers, using their strength to oppress the weak in
contrast to their oaths as knights. Urban rebuked them for this
abominable behavior and charged them to turn their energies towards
reclaiming the Holy Land. Meanwhile he encouraged those left at home
– the elderly and the infirm, women, children and clergymen – to
remain at peace with one another and support the crusaders with
prayer. Urban was equally occupied with sending soldiers on Crusades
and with keeping a holy peace at home.
Although we have no way of knowing exactly what Urban said, we do
know the reaction he received: Upon hearing the words of the pope,
the crowd cried out, "It is the will of God! It is the will of
The pope was so moved by this outcry that he closed his speech by
saying, "Let this then be your war-cry in combats, because this
word is given to you by God. When an armed attack is made upon the
enemy, let this one cry be raised by all the soldiers of God: It is
the will of God! It is the will of God!"